From the horse's mouth....
I found this in my inbox today, and it is being published here with the writer's permission.
"I know that you all know this stuff, but I just need to write this out and have people be as sickened as I am.
Had a visit at the birth center yesterday from a friend who is a CNM and she brought 6 of her RN students with her to talk about normal birth. I made sure the conversation included the why's of the current OB climate in most hospitals.
The visiting CNM brought up a very recent OB section meeting at the hospital where she is employed. The discussion centered around the hospital's attempt to decrease their high induction and C/sec rates. Most of the physicians complained about the effect these changes would have on their schedules and the fact that they would be doing more C/sec at 2 AM if they weren't allowed to do them at 38 weeks. And the induction at 38 weeks helped them to fit in their surgical schedules which also bring quite a bit of revenue into the hospital. The OB clinical managers talked about how they need to have the inductions and C/sec scheduled so they can keep tighter control on their budgets because they can be more cost efficient with staff assignments and minimize on-call time.
J., the CNM, was just amazed that not even once did the welfare of the mom and/or baby enter into the discussion.
Personally my attempts not to become cynical are very quickly biting the dust. Sick, just sick! And women have no idea that their birth experience is the least of the hospital's concerns.
Linda Johnson, CNM
www.mothersownbirth.com"
I know a girl who had an induction last week on her due date. The reason given? She was told because she had gained too much weight during her pregnancy. I've not heard the outcome yet, but I won't be surprised to hear if it was an "emergency" cesarean.
I know another girl who's sister had a scheduled repeat cesarean last week at 38 weeks, 0 days. The reason given? The baby was too big. Wanna know how much the baby weighed at birth? SIX pounds, ZERO ounces. The doctor was quoted as being "shocked" the little boy was so tiny.
There are moms contacting me every single week, at least two or three of them, who have found my name on the ICAN website. They are desperate to avoid another cesarean, many of them have learned that their first was for a bogus reason, and that drives them that much harder to find appropriate prenatal care. I know of moms who drive hours and hours back and forth for their prenatal care because the only "friendly" provider she could find was two hours away.
I've said it before, but I'll say it again here...I *never* in my wildest dreams would have imagined to be walking the path that I am right now. I never would have thought that women would be contacting ME of all people for information on how to avoid unnecessary surgery. I never would have imagined hearing all of the lies that women have been told, stories that fill my inbox almost daily. I never would have thought that I could be so supremely disgusted with such a large segment of the population...those who are trained and take an oath to do no harm...the feeling I get these days is that the do no harm applies to their schedule, their kid's recitals, their golf games, their "work hours", their bank accounts.
I used to work as a travel agent with crazy hours. I worked at least three Saturdays a month and well into the evening on most work days. When I complained to my manager about my hours and how I would prefer to work Monday-Friday from 9-5, she suggested I walk myself over to the doctor's office next door and apply for a job there where I would be guaranteed the hours I wanted. My point? If you didn't want to deal with malpractice insurance, if you never wanted to have the expectation of being alert for surgery in the middle of the night, if you never wanted to worry about being sued...maybe you chose the wrong career path.
Might I suggest the Myers Briggs or Occupational Outlook Handbook? I think I might just create a packet of information to send out to the local OB's who refuse to "first do no harm" to so many local women.
One last thought....what do you call the guy who was last in his class at medical school?
Doctor.
7 comments:
Hi, i just happened upon your vid on youtube and clicked to your blog.
I felt like i needed to say hello and to give you a pat on your back for doing whatever you can to get the word out there to women who are expecting. My first birth was a hospital induction and i was fortunate enough to avoid a c/s but it was still an incredibly traumatic experience for me. This time we're planning on a home birth with Linda Johnson so i was just pleased and delighted to see her letter here on your blog. She's just a lovely woman.
Hi, i just happened upon your vid on youtube and clicked to your blog.
I felt like i needed to say hello and to give you a pat on your back for doing whatever you can to get the word out there to women who are expecting. My first birth was a hospital induction and i was fortunate enough to avoid a c/s but it was still an incredibly traumatic experience for me. This time we're planning on a home birth with Linda Johnson so i was just pleased and delighted to see her letter here on your blog. She's just a lovely woman.
GAH!!!! That's all I can really say! It just makes NO SENSE to me!!!
What's the difference between God and a Doctor?
God doesn't think he's a doctor.
I like your blog. I always love it when I click on a new blog and enjoy the content. Then to look in the blog reel and find we enjoy reading the same blogs!!
Actually, the problem ISN'T the doctors - to think that the fault lies with them is myopic at best. The problem is the litigious nature of our society and the fact that EVERYONE expects a perfect baby and when they don't get it....they sue. If lawsuits were capped at a reasonable amount or banned altogether then guess what....doctors might be willing to take a risk with a vaginal birth. Otherwise, it's c-section city, ladies. Get used to it.
Oh, Anonymous...how I WISH that the doctors were not the problem! You make a really great point that we live in a litigious society, yes we certainly do, and that people have this unrealistic expectation for perfection, yes that too.
But.
Let's talk about myopic. Myopic is the idea that surgical birth is an acceptable means of producing a baby for over 30% of women having babies, then ensuring that 90% of those women who go on to have more children deliver surgically again when there is only a HALF OF A PERCENT of a chance of her uterus rupturing, with the chances of fetal mortality is low even with a rupture. And, actually, if you read the most recent study that has come out about uterine rupture, you'd know that the actual incidence of rupture is closer to half of that 0.5% (you can find that study in the January 2009 American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology).
Myopic is the absence of consideration for what all of these surgeries are going to mean for women in 10, 20, or even 50 years.
Myopic is the believe that vaginal birth is risky, as you mentioned. Did you know you have a better chance of losing your baby from an amnio than you do from a vbac? Did you receive that information when you signed your "consent" form? I'd be willing to bet you didn't.
So while you are looking to rain on my parade, Anonymous, I hope you know I carry a very large umbrella with me at all times to protect myself from people like you. Very large, indeed.
I hope next time you post you have the courage to link back to your own blog, then we can all see who you are what you are all about.
Best wishes for an empowering and life transforming birth to you!
-MM
I once believed in statistics... that I wouldn't become one of them, but I am now part of the uterine rupture during VBAC percentage. After a c-section with my first child after a failed induction attempt, I was determined to have a natural birth for my second child. I read all the information and I asked my prior doctor after my c-section about my chances for a successful VBAC. She told me I should be a good candidate, but what she failed to tell me because she didn't bother taking the time to look at her notes was that she had given me an inverted T incision. So, while I found a doctor that was very supportive of a VBAC, I ruptured and my beautiful, otherwise healthy daughter died less than 10 mintues before they could get her out. While I still firmly believe women should have a chance at a normal birth after a c-section, I think the focus should be more on preventing the first section. For those who do choose VBAC, please make sure you obtain the surgical report from your first c-section, so that you and your doctor can make a more informed decision. I am not leaving my email address for privacy reasons. My loss happened less than 3 months ago and I am still raw with emotion, but as I continue to search for answers that I know I won't find online, I came across your postings and I felt I needed to warn others that statistics are only on paper- If you really want a VBAC, make sure you are comfortable with the risk and have all the information.
Post a Comment